We Two: Victoria and Albert: Rulers, Partners, Rivals
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sort customer reviews by: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Show All Reviews on Page
Hide All Reviews on Page
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We Two: Victoria and Albert: Rulers, Partners, Rivals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Book Description
It was the most influential marriage of the nineteenth century--and one of history’s most enduring love stories. Traditional biographies tell us that Queen Victoria inherited the throne as a naïve teenager, when the British Empire was at the height of its power, and seemed doomed to find failure as a monarch and misery as a woman until she married her German cousin Albert and accepted him as her lord and master. Now renowned chronicler Gillian Gill turns this familiar story on its head, revealing a strong, feisty queen and a brilliant, fragile prince working together to build a family based on support, trust, and fidelity, qualities neither had seen much of as children. The love affair that emerges is far more captivating, complex, and relevant than that depicted in any previous account. The epic relationship began poorly. The cousins first met as teenagers for a few brief, awkward, chaperoned weeks in 1836. At seventeen, charming rather than beautiful, Victoria already “showed signs of wanting her own way.” Albert, the boy who had been groomed for her since birth, was chubby, self-absorbed, and showed no interest in girls, let alone this princess. So when they met again in 1839 as queen and presumed prince-consort-to-be, neither had particularly high hopes. But the queen was delighted to discover a grown man, refined, accomplished, and whiskered. “Albert is beautiful!” Victoria wrote, and she proposed just three days later. As Gill reveals, Victoria and Albert entered their marriage longing for intimate companionship, yet each was determined to be the ruler. This dynamic would continue through the years--each spouse, headstrong and impassioned, eager to lead the marriage on his or her own terms. For two decades, Victoria and Albert engaged in a very public contest for dominance. Against all odds, the marriage succeeded, but it was always a work in progress. And in the end, it was Albert’s early death that set the Queen free to create the myth of her marriage as a peaceful idyll and her husband as Galahad, pure and perfect. As Gill shows, the marriage of Victoria and Albert was great not because it was perfect but because it was passionate and complicated. Wonderfully nuanced, surprising, often acerbic--and informed by revealing excerpts from the pair’s journals and letters--We Two is a revolutionary portrait of a queen and her prince, a fascinating modern perspective on a couple who have become a legend. Amazon Exclusive: An Essay by Gillian Gill
Until my teens, my sister Rose and I were reared jointly by our mother and her mother. Mummy and Nana lived together all their lives, quarreled every day, but shared a passion for the British royal family. In our house, the pantheon of royals was worshipped with more fervor and regularity than we mustered at the plain little branch of the Church of Wales just around the corner. The royals were glamour and romance, items severely rationed in post-war Britain. 1953, the year of Queen Elizabeth II’s coronation, was a banner year for our family. My mother bought a television set and invited her humbler relatives over to squint at the magnificent event on our twelve inch, black and white set. There followed a street party and my grandmother, who had once apprenticed as a milliner, contrived marvelous costumes for Rose and me. I was actually queen for the day with a long white dress, purple robe, and crown, orb, and scepter. But once my father retired from the Merchant Navy and took his place in the family, his carefully informed left-wing politics took hold of me and my grandmother’s reverence for the royal family began to seem silly and ignorant. When I was about seventeen, I made some flip remark about the abdication of King Edward VIII which so infuriated Nana that she slapped my face. At the time I was shocked and wholly at a loss. Now I think I understand. A handsome and engaging young king had once come to South Wales and spoken movingly of the plight of the miners. Women of my grandmother’s generation had never forgotten it. Like the rest of the general public in Britain, she had been carefully shielded by the press from any knowledge of Edward VIII’s prenuptial dalliances and fascist opinions. By 1965 I was a graduate of Cambridge University, the first of my family to attend university and a budding academic. When it was announced that the Queen Mother would come to New Hall, my Cambridge college, to open the new buildings, I was blasé to the point of disdain. But when I found myself curtseying and carefully shaking the tips of Her Majesty’s gloved fingers, I was swept away by the mystique of royalty. How delightful the Queen was in person and how proud my grandmother would be when she saw the photo of me with the Queen Mum. All of which is to explain why my book about Queen Victoria is prefaced by the old English saying: “A cat may look at a king.” --Gillian Gill (Photo © Linda Crosskey) A Look Inside We Two
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 5 of 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Review Date |
Review Rating(5 High) |
Review Helpful to: |
Customer Review | Reviewer Info |
Permanent Link |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews Below Sorted by Newest First | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-23-09 | 4 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When Queen Victoria, who had ascended the English throne as a teenager, married her German cousin, Prince Albert, it was considered by many to be a marriage of convenience. But for 21 years it turned out to be much more than that. Victoria, who was not a great beauty, but charming and headstrong and used to getting her own way, adored her handsome prince, who was reserved and cool but also ambitious. They both wanted to dominate in the marriage and this rivalry for power often led to frustration. But through it all their deep love and respect for one another triumphed and prevailed, and Victoria, who bore Albert nine children, was devastated when he died in his early forties.
Author Gill has made these two people, who are often depicted as stock figures in history books, into real flesh and blood people, passionate and compelling, who touch your heart. They both had faults as well as virtues and their effects upon European history are profound. Indeed some historians believe World War 1 could havs been avoided if Albert, who was a true statesman, had lived. We'll never know that of course, but this book is a fascinating read. (Review Data Last Updated: 2009-08-14 12:47:03 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-22-09 | 5 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We know what "Victorian" means - especially in sexual matters, it means prudish, and perhaps hypocritical. There is elaborate decoration in Victorian architecture, and sentimentality in Victorian art. We know an Elizabethan time, but that's Elizabeth I; I venture that we will not make an adjective out of the current Queen Elizabeth, nor will we have a future Carolingian era. Queen Victoria happened to be on the throne during important times of her nation, and that her name is given to characteristics that didn't actually have much to do with her personally is just happenstance. Much of what we think of Victorian Britain, however, does actually come from the Queen, but more importantly comes jointly from the married team of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. This is the lesson in _We Two: Victoria and Albert: Rulers, Partners, Rivals_ (Ballantine Books) by Gillian Gill, a spectacularly detailed, big, and intimate dual biography of one of history's greatest power couples. It is a vivid account of a marriage of two people who prospered through the many obstacles set against nineteenth century royalty.
Obstacles there were. There was a history of horrid, stupid behavior among European royals, and consequent disrespect from the populace. The royal marriages were arranged by parents and were often sad or angry failures, with scandals, lovers, and bastards making everything more complicated. Both Victoria and Albert were brought up to be abstinent until marriage. This is not surprising in the Queen's case, but in Albert's, it is amazing, for the father and uncle who raised him were not like that at all. The young Queen was intelligent, cooperative, and a good judge of character. She was a splendid catch, and although the match between her and Albert had been planned for years, Victoria found much to like in the young prince. Despite the Victorian stereotype, the couple as far as we can tell had a jubilant and frequent erotic life starting from the first happy night of their marriage. They did, after all, have nine children, but more importantly, they had a sexual compatibility that complemented their affections for each other. "She was madly in love," writes Gill, "and he was pleased to be adored." The bed was a refuge; they were under constant observation during their days, but in bed they had privacy, not only for physical passion but to speak their minds openly. Aside from sex, the companionship and affection the couple found were like nothing either had known as a child. Albert had plenty of talent, and used his position as Victoria's husband to get a lot done. His triumph was his planning and execution of the Great Exhibition at the Crystal Palace in 1851, but it was so much work that it took a great toll on his energy, a downturn that continued until his death nine years later. The exhibition welcomed Britons of all classes in, and thus built the sympathy of the British public to Victoria and Albert; correspondingly, there was alienation from the aristocracy. Upon Albert's death, Victoria went into her famous decades of mourning, feeling the neglect with which her nation had faced her husband. The nation felt mourning, too, going into a spate of naming things for Albert and making monuments in cities and villages. _We Two_, as a portrait of a marriage, necessarily finishes up quickly after Albert's death, with an acknowledgment that the Queen was able to use her relationships with secretaries and ministers to fill the working relationship she had with the Prince. Her need for a feeling of protection and security came from John Brown, a Highlander who had been the Prince's manservant, and who became close enough to the Queen to make people wonder if they had a physical relationship. If Victoria was really Victorian, no one would wonder. Gill's is an exemplary history, full of intimate details and reasoned analysis of historical and social forces upon the married pair. Not only was theirs a successful marriage, they deserve credit for preserving the monarchy as a respectable institution. (Review Data Last Updated: 2009-08-14 12:47:03 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-08-09 | 5 | 2\2 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The legend of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert is that they were a devoted couple who ruled England side by side for twenty happy years until Albert died of typhoid fever at the age of 42. Victoria then spent the next forty years in lonely widowhood until she herself died in 1901.
Gillian Gill's fine new biography of The Queen and her Prince Consort confirms part of this legend, but refutes several other segments which most people considered to be the ironclad truth. Gill's most fascinating revelation is that Victoria and Albert were engaged in a power struggle throughout most of their marriage that strained it almost to the breaking point and had a profound impact on their nation, children, and they themselves. The first part of We Two details Victoria and Albert's difficult childhoods. Victoria was caught in the middle of a permanent conflict between her widowed mother and her uncles George IV and William IV. She was overprotected, not sleeping alone until she became Queen. Albert was the younger son of the duke of a ramshackle little German principality. His parents separated when he was young, and Albert was raised in an atmosphere that considered women inferior to men. When Victoria became Queen in 1837 her uncle Leopold encouraged her to marry her first cousin Albert, and they did so in 1840, when both were twenty. Victoria quickly became abject to Albert, while the Prince seems to have loved the Queen's power and position more than he did the woman. Victoria's emotional neediness and Albert's desire to rule combined to create a partnership in which Albert actually held most of the power, subject to Victoria's temper and the mood of the British political establishment. Gill refutes a number of long held myths about Victoria and Albert, some of which were created by the widowed Queen herself. She speculates that Albert must have had some pre-marital sexual experience in order to so quickly satisfy his wife and sire children. She also provides some intriguing and surprising speculations on the couple's erotic history, using as evidence the large number of artworks featuring naked subjects in arresting poses installed in the couple's private residences. Prince Albert's vaunted political abilities are cut down to size with some well done discussions of political and foreign policy issues of the period. Despite some revisionism, what emerges from We Two is pretty much the same story we've heard all along: Albert was a not very popular foreigner with uncertain political skills who nevertheless managed to encourage scientific and technological development, while Victoria was a highly emotional and deeply possessive woman whose personal needs irritated her husband at times and estranged her from her children. We Two is well written, scholarly and witty at the same time, particularly in the notes where Gill allows herself a few snickers. There are some small errors of fact: children are misidentified in some of the pictures, foreign rulers get the wrong roman numerals attached to them in some cases, and a few over generalizations, as when Gill assers that after Albert's death Victoria always wore black and never wore jewels again. This ignores, among many others, the famous Diamond Jubilee photograph of 1897 which shows the aged Queen showered with gems. But these are small errors which do not detract from the overall excellence of the book. (Review Data Last Updated: 2009-08-03 02:02:46 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-07-09 | 3 | 1\2 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lots of useful information, including plenty on Albert translated from German sources that I don't think have been consulted before. Now comes the but--the picture of the Royal family at Osbourne misidentifies the two eldest princesses. Alice is the one at the left standing a bit apart, while the tallest princess in the group on the right is very clearly Vickie. In the notes, it is the present Crown Prince and Princess of Japan who do not have a male child and thus have created a problem with that succession not the Emperor. Also in the notes, while most historians agree that the last Empress of Russia was seriously affected by the hemophilia of her only son, this is the first time I have read that she went mad because of it. Finally, anyone who has read Queen Victoria's letters knows that she was far from pleased that her grandaughter Alix was attracted and became engaged to Nicolas of Russia. Indeed, she tried to prevent the engagement!! There are several other errors I caught and I must agree with a previous reviewer that it does make you question the care the author took with her research on other matters covered in this book.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2009-08-03 02:02:46 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-28-09 | 4 | 1\2 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The book was enjoyable and a good read, perhaps focusing a bit more on Albert than some other books I've read. At the end of Chapter 20, the author refers to William Hartington Cavendish, "the seventh Duke of Devonshire" as the "bachelor duke" who took Joseph Paxton "as his lifelong friend". That is an error. It was the sixth duke, William George Spencer Cavendish, who was known as the bachelor duke and who made Paxton his gardener at Chatsworth (Hartington is the courtesy title typically given to the Duke's heir). This seemed to me a very careless error and left me wondering whether the book contains other errors of fact.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2009-07-12 14:25:02 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 5 of 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||