Over a year after publication, this book still provides the clearest overall account of Al Qaeda's global strategy, integrating Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistani operations among others.

Riedel's experience at the CIA and National Security Council shows in his command of details and the confidence with which he writes. This is a balanced, authoritative account of a decade and a half of conflict with Al Qaeda, interspersed with personal anecdotes.

Bruce Riedel was high-placed and gives an authoritative picture of al Qaeda. The footnotes and references are impressive. Perhaps a lower level person, or even an insider, could have provided more intimate details, but this is a very helpful book.

Although only 154 pages, in this book Mr. Riedel tells us, in detail, about the origin of al Qaeda, the Taliban and other groups under its umbrella. He explains how central the Israeli/Palestine conflict is to al Qaeda's thinking as well as Pakistan's predicament (Afghanistan/India). Mr. Riedel has summarized the dangers, philosophy and acts of al Qaeda and what the U.S. can do to end their jihad. He has clarified a lot of confusing facts for the average American and other Westerners.

Bruce Riedel was in the CIA for almost 30 years, and a close advisor to several US Presidents, and has met many world leaders. The book also gave me new appreciation for the work of Presidents Clinton and Bush.

In a nutshell, I can not overemphasis how important it is that you read this book! It is without a doubt the best read on post 9-11 international affairs I have ever read. Clear, easy to read and extremely insightful as to the whos, whys and wheres of Al Qaeda.

The book also puts forth answers on what the US should do to resolve the AQ problem, the Israeli-Palestinian issue, the negative view of the USA by Muslims worldwide, and other critical issues we face today!

The book is only 154 pages of text, so is not a long read, but the book is succinct, well thought out and doesn't waste paper on blathering about unrelated issues.

The book, I must admit, has opened my eyes. I feel I now have a much more sympathetic view of Islam as a religion, and of different cultures such as the Saudi Kingdom, Jordan, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, etc.

The book also addresses the goals of AQ, the ways it plans on conducting "raids" on America, and when those raids are most likely to occur, and how.

I approached the book with the intent to learn, and learn I did. I kept a notepad and pen next to me and noted words that I needed to look up and find the meanings of. I learned a lot of new Arabic words, which is helpful in this understanding. Let me share some new words I learned and their meanings:

UMMAH - community or nation
CALIPHATE - form of govt. inspired by Islam
HEGEMONY- leadership via military power
FATAH - major Palestinian political party
HIJAZ- western part of Saudi Arabia bordering Red Sea
WAHHABI-a very strict version of Isalm named after an 18th century scholar
FATWA- ruling by religious cleric of Islam
ULEMA - educated class of scholar in legal matters
MULLAH- muslim man educated in Islamic theology & sacred law
ISI- Pakistani intelligence service
CHADORS- black robe worn by Muslim women covering head to toe

I highly recommend you get this book and read it ASAP.

Great book, the author bring substance that explain some of the puzzle. Although not so thoroughly about the Qaeda search as the title suggest. Perhaps the Israel Lobby in Government (Dennis Ross et Al.) will not like recommendations to ease tension in the region like withdraw suggestions for Israel from the OCUPPY PALESTINIANS TERRITORY that is left in order to resolution in the conflict that is exploit as a grievance for the Muslims, it's a great reading that I enjoy a lot. (Very different that we can said regarding the crap writing by the Zionist representatives in the federal government)

I like a book that does what it says it's going to do. The title lays it all out. This is a succinct overview of the principal leaders of al Qaeda, their goals and how they can be defeated.

Riedel builds the case that to defeat terrorism we can't make a war on the concept of terrorism, but must alleviate the grievances that give rise to it make it a priority to hunt down its leadership. He discusses the issues of concern to the terrorists and their followers and how they have been exacerbated in recent years.

The biographies were excellent because they show how each of the main players developed. The sections on goals and future directions are marvelously clear.

While I follow the news, there was a lot new to me. I had not fully understood the role of Pakistan and how its decisions regarding al Qaeda are fueled by its India dispute. I didn't know how it was that bin Laden went to Afghanistan, nor of the void left there after the defeat of the Russians. I didn't fully understand Zawahiri's ideas on the decline of the Ottoman Empire until Reidel made them clear.

Reidel mentions forgotten (by me) events such as the attempt to fly into the Eiffel Tower and the expulsion of Palestinians from Kuwait and shows their significance. I did not know Zawahiri cut his teeth on the Sadat assassination.

The author makes every sentence work. In this way, a very short book becomes a very meaty gathering of important information.

I am so grateful that BRUCE REIDEL wrote this book because his attitude is all about understanding WHY we should act this way and not that way. He explains WHY past policies haven't worked, and why what he suggests WILL--but the great, great part is that he does it without trying to CONVERT you to his side, he's all about common sense, he writes without a bunch of hyperbole or political double-talk. Maybe I appreciate this book so much because my attitude, too, is that it's essential to understand the cultural history and thinking of a people in order to work out compromise; to work out peace. I'm giving it to a bunch of my politically-inclined friends for the holidays. It is, I believe, an essential primer for anyone and everyone who will want to know WHY the presidential/national policy is going to shift from Iraq to the Pakistan/Afghanistan border during this coming administration...& then say "Well, damn, why didn't we do this before?!" READ THIS BOOK!

If you are tired of the same old talking heads blathering on TV about things they don't really know about, this is the book for you. Bruce Riedel is the real expert on Al Qaeda and these regions that are so important to US national security. The book reads easily, even with the names that are unfamiliar to the US reader, and communicates a narrative that flows and makes sense. Mr. Riedel could go on for hundreds of pages with the knowledge and background he has, but instead chose to make every page count in a concise account with less than 200 pages. Before I read this book, the whole Al Qaeda-Taliban-Muslim Brotherhood-Sudan-Shiite-Sunni-Iran-Wahabism thing was a morass for me, but this book connected the dots. If only the Bush Administration had chosen to follow this reasoned approach of "knowing your enemy" that won the Cold War, instead of lumping all these issues into a war on "terrorism," the US would be more secure today. This book falls into the "every American needs to read this" category, to understand the nature of the threats and challenges we face!

This is a fascinating and important account of the whole Middle East problem with a focus on Al Qaeda by someone who has had firsthand experience in the region for the last thirty years. Riedel served in the CIA for thirty years, advised three Presidents and was also an adviser to NATO for three years, from 2003 to 2006. He has the credentials and the credibility.

The bulk of the book--Chapters Two through Five--treats Zawahiri, Osama (as he calls him), Mullah Omar and Zarqawi. Any reader will definitely learn something he/she didn't know about them from these chapters.

However, the real heart of this book is Chapter Seven, How to Defeat al Qaeda. I have no doubt that Riedel is making his suggestions based on extensive knowledge of the areas, but as I read them, I wondered at the feasibility of many of his proposals.

First, he talks of breaking the narrative of Al Qaeda. At the heart of this narrative/grievance is the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. His solution is the two-state one, with Israel abandoning almost of the West Bank and Gaza. His plan is for the 500,000 Israeli settlers to abandon their settlements, and for Palestinian refugees to have the choice of returning to the West Bank or receiving compensation from some international fund (the cost estimated at between $45-$50 billion). He doesn't discuss who is going to compensate the Israeli settlers. Furthermore, Hamas must be a part of the process. In addition, Jerusalem will become an international city once again.

Is all or any of this possible?


Second, for Afghanistan, he wants a Marshall Plan (who's going to pay for it?) to reconstruct the country and a buildup of their army and police force. He actually believes that better roads will lead the poppy farmers to abandon growing poppies and turn to produce. A recent report on the Taliban in Rolling Stone (October 30, 2008) makes Afghanistan sound like a madhouse where all the inmates are armed and in control.


Last, Pakistan he identifies as "the most important and difficult nation to deal with in order to destroy Al Qaeda". . .. Yet, his suggestion is not to support any more dictators and to let democracy rule even though throughout the book he is concerned about the shawdowy role of ISI (the Pakistan intelligence service) in bombings, assassinations and even Pakistan's acquisition of nuclear bombs. Is all this going to change because they have another election?

For Kashmir, he realizes that India will never withdraw, but he still suggests giving the Valley of Kashmir and Srinigar to Pakistan. Will India ever agree to this?

Riedel has many other ideas that may work eventually--e.g., enlist other Arab countries in the fight against Al Qaeda--but I have listed only those suggestions that I find problematic.

This is a very informative book and (Chapters One through Six) a fascinating read. I recommend it to anyone who wants to know more about the problems in that part of the world. It's just that his solutions sound more like a wish-list than real, grounded possibilities that the next President could act on. I hope I'm wrong.

This book provides a very detailed description of that mysterious phenomenon called `al Qaeda' and offers a strategy to counter the threat that it poses to the U.S. and its allies. Bruce Riedel is by most rational standards an expert on Middle Eastern affairs. He has spent the better part of his government career engaged in the research and analysis of the Middle East and now resides at the Brookings Institute as one of their stable of expert.

Riedel provides a broad outline of al Qaeda including brief biographies of Osma bin Laden and his principal lieutenant Ayman al Zawahari. Perhaps more importantly he identifies the ideology behind the strategic thinking of al Qaeda. In the course of doing so he also explains the close alliance between al Qaeda and the still active Taliban religious movement in Afghanistan. In Riedel's analysis the strategic goal of al Qaeda is to drive the West from the Realm of Islam (Dar al Islam), to establish a Sharia based Caliphate over world wide Islam, and of course to eliminate Israel. Fortunately the majority of Muslims do not necessarily agree with this goal. Still it is a fact that many Muslims see the days of the Baghdad Caliphate (circa 800-1200 CE) as a golden age and often reflect that the age secular nationalism has brought Muslims more humiliations than triumphs.

Riedel's strategy for defeating al Qaeda and its cult of violence is multi-tiered and correctly centers on Afghanistan and Pakistan not Iraq. And he views the struggle as much ideological as military. In his opinion the present administration of George W. Bush blundered badly in its efforts to deal with the continuing threat from al Qaeda and indeed with Operation Iraqi Freedom did exactly what bin Laden had hoped the U.S. would do.

Riedel is clearly not a supporter of the Bush Administration and is in point of fact an advisor to Barrack Obama. Nonetheless this does not invalidate his arguments for how to cope with al Qaeda and to prosecute the real war on terror. This reviewer does not agree with all of his prescriptions for dealing with the al Qaeda Menace, but certainly admits his expertise and subject matter knowledge.