this is the kind of book that once you pick it up, you can't resist the temptation to finish it in one reading. it is just so interesting and captivating. i love all the factual stories and the way the author told it in first person conversational mode. as if you are having a beer with a seasoned journalist who has been around for a long time, who has seen it all.

many reviewers on this board expressed a valid critique that despite all the factual data points, the author failed to articulate a conclusion or some kind of "policy" statement, the so called "to do list" to help US and Mexico to make life better for the mexican people. while i understand and respect this critique, i also believe Bowden is a journalist in the mode of "we report, you decide". the last thing i want is my reporter doing his/her "spin" that becomes common in the liberal media.

as to the content of the book. i do have a few questions for myself to ponder...

1. is there anything "genetically corrupt" (to quote a mexican journalist in this book) about the mexican culture?

2. why after 60+ years, mexico is still trailing. while all the asian tigers have ascended to first world status in much shorter time. even China, which is as corrupt as mexico but at least 1/3 or China's econ. is not pushing narcos and another 1/3 for pushing illegals into United States.

3. the author pointed out NAFTA has actually made life difficult for mexico as they lost jobs to China. Chinese workers earn even less than mexicans. then, why the latest stats reveals that China is moving toward a consumer based econ and currently being the #1 lender to feed US borrowings. if low wage and failure to compete to lower wages is the reason, why mexico failed and china succeeded?

4. the author pointed to the devastation of the "war on drugs" on Mexico. the implicit argument is, legalization may bring relief to this. however, why Colombia, just as narco many years ago, has reduced the drug econ. from 30% of GDP to barely 10%. why Colombia can but mexico cannot?

5. the implication to United States. over 60% of all hispanics immigrants are mexicans in US. why after 60 yrs, hispanics are still the underclass, earns less than other race groups, has less education, more imprisoned per capita....this is despite the "affirmation action" programs in governments and many public US corporations to actively help and recruit hispanics. whereas other immigrant groups are striving ahead on their own without government race based quota....

these are the questions one begins to ponder. i am not saying mexico does not want to improve. i saw a documentary on Brazil's national TV that mexico is the #1 Latin country sending the most students to China to learn the chinese model. this shows mexico wants to learn. this is a plus. may be mexico should copy the Confucius model which has made S.Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Japan such a success?

this is a fantastic book to help us start this thinking process. definitely a must read if you are one of the "spring breakers" whose view of mexico is from your last resort experiences.

Very eye opening on a corner of the world we don't often hear about. Who would think the US exported a shooting war on drugs?

This book has a story to tell and is a very sad and frightening tale. The problem is it takes forever to wade through the Authors odd style of writing. Why he picked this dreamy, slightly stoned writing style is beyond me. It is repetitious to the point of absurdity. As Sergeant Friday used to say, the facts, Mr. BOWDEN, JUST GIVE ME THE FACTS!

When he gets down to really writing, the book sizzles but there is so much missing. Surely someone in the Mexican Army would be willing to talk, how about some of the surviving families that have escaped to the US, where are the politicians of Juarez and is there a Drug Lord available?

Read this book but be ready to jump read...

I'm halfway through the book and feel like I've already read each chapter 3 times. The wrong Bowden wrote this book...Mark Bowden should have written it. At least we would have gotten a historical background to Juarez, and some actual hard facts and information. Charles Bowden makes too many vague references to the problems he is trying to describe. He also has a strange fixation on Miss Sinaloa who's tragic story he keeps coming back to and never gives justice to. Here's a challenge to anyone who's bound and determined to read this book, count how many times he references the ¨dust¨ in Juarez and how many sentences he begins with ¨I¨. Any English teacher would have given him a D for this effort.

I listened to a public radio book promoting interview with Author Bowden where he had a lot to say about NAFTA, Bill Clinton, US Policy and Mexican government corruption.. So I bought the book. What a disapointment. The book is a disjointed rambling about all of the carnage in Juarez. After a couple of chapters I was saying, "ya, I get it, where's some background, some insight on the real casual problems and maybe suggested solutions?", never got it. I think a good editor could have reduced the book into a pamphlet. Charles Bowden sounded like an intelligent man on radio. Perhaps he can write another book with real substance about this ongoing horrible situation for the citizens of Mexico.

I was looking for information, a cogent narrative, or a story arc. What we got was a rambling book that lacked focus and was very repetitive. After the 100th time the author told us that citizens keep their mouths shut, all authorities are corrupt and infiltrated, life is cheap, and violence endemic, I think I got it. I did enjoy the parts about the sicario. Maybe the editor should have cut some of the author's ramblings about his feelings and how he was changed by Juarez. I almost quit reading this book about 10 times. I just decided to skim the book in order to complete it. The writing style was repetitive, confusing, solipsistic, and didn't really follow any direct paths.

A book badly in need of an editor! I expected a straight journalistic reporting of what is happening in Juarez. Instead, much of the book consists of random stream of consciousness paragraphs surrounded by white space. What is this? The factual chapters were excellent and contained good information, but there weren't enough of them to make the book. Perhaps that explains the strange paragraphs and white space? Nevertheless, I learned a lot about the horror of what is happening since our newspapers are not reporting the extent of the violence in Juarez--and I live right across the border in El Paso! I'm glad I read the book.

This is a twisted mess of a book, convoluted and poetic, some wild mix of Jack Kerouac and Raymond Chandler and Truman Capote and something much pulpier. The writing is fantastic, with chilling metaphors that fit perfectly the madness in Juarez.

There are no simple answers for the situation there. A perfect storm of systemic corruption, trade politics, globalization, illegal drugs, poverty and gang violence have created a city where drug smuggling, murder and illegal human trafficking is less about a morality and more about opportunity. The only opportunity. Even the low-wage factories, the maquiladoras, where many in Juarez have traditionally made their un-livable living, are closing down as companies take their business overseas to even cheaper labor markets like China. As a result, there is no hope in Juarez, a city that is more dangerous than Iraq. In this city that is visible from El Paso, Texas, it is not uncommon for a dozen people to be killed in a day. For bodies to be found half-buried in the desert, arms and mouths bound with duct tape, doused in gasoline and burned. For bodies to be found wrapped in plastic, decapitated. For young women and girls to disappear and be found weeks later, raped, murdered. For the corrupt police to show up and block off a street for the corrupt army, who arrives, rounds up a group of people, systematically executes them and then leaves. For reporters who take the wrong photos or ask the wrong questions to be disappeared. For children to be caught in the crossfire as their parents are gunned down. To find bodies with hundreds of rounds in them. To find bodies of people who were tortured for days. To find "death houses," where under the floorboards lie dozens rotting bodies of anonymous Mexicans. And all the while, in the U.S., all we hear of is the heroic "war against drugs" that the Mexican government is waging, battling the cartels.

What is the truth in Juarez? Who's at fault? There is no truth. We're all at fault. Here is a city that is barely third-world, at the border of one of the wealthiest countries in the world, a country with an insatiable appetite for drugs and an endless supply of weapons. When the drug routes through Miami were squeezed out, the route shifted through Juarez. Those who saw the opportunity in Juarez, those who had the power to seize it, seized it. And they have crushed all hope in the city and made crime and killing the only lucrative opportunity. That, or leave Juarez and hope to make it across the border.

Bowden uses the story of a recurring character, Miss Sinaloa, a singer who came up to Juarez from a town down south, intending to have a good time. She got high at a party, and then was gang-raped and beaten for a week. She lost her mind. She lives in a house now, a "crazy place," as Bowden calls it. She is a metaphor for the city, a place that once had as much potential as any city and now exemplifies the absolute worst of humanity.

Although Bowden doesn't get much into the politics of immigration, this is a very timely book, one that makes painfully obvious that illegal immigration is not an issue--it is a symptom. Until there is opportunity in places like Juarez, until there is more opportunity than crime or escape, a fence or tighter border patrols will not solve things the way they need to be solved. People will not stop trying to cross the border. Hell, if I lived in Juarez, I'd cross the border or die trying. Illegal? Screw the law. The "law" in Juarez is just as likely to kill you as the cartels. The law just is another cartel. So if I'm in Juarez, I'm going for the border. And are you going to blame me? Wouldn't you do the same? If your life depended on it?

After reading Roberto Bolaño's 2666, I wanted to learn more about the situation in Juarez. I'm not sure how I found this book, but what a lucky find. And even luckier that I got to listen to Bowden read it. I highly recommend the audiobook version of MURDER CITY. Bowden's read is chilling. His voice is deep and gravely and he sounds like someone who has spent a lot of time staring out across the desert, wondering what the hell is going on out there.

We owe a debt of gratitude to Charles Bowden for setting the record straight that we can't set the record straight in Juarez. I have been reading Bowden's work since I moved to Arizona twenty years ago and have learned over time that he is a stickler for facts. When he says the violence in Juarez has no simple explanation and has become systemic, almost a way of life that the living shrug off and erase from memory, I believe him. In "Murder City" he has written a literary Hurt Locker; he walks through the streets of Juarez unscathed. If he is unable to prevent the killing, he can at least report on what he sees and knows and feels after spending years in a place where, as he says, everyone is in play.

If you enjoyed "Murder City," try Mike Davis' "Planet of Slums" as a chaser.

I purchased the book hoping for a well researched commentary. What caused the violence in Juarez, what role does NAFTA play, what are the greater issues behind the cartel wars. Bowden does make many claims, yet he does not seem to offer any arguement in support of those claims. He is content to tell you that all are corrupt, you should just take his word for it. His objective seems to be to illustrate the human misery which is abundant in Juarez and elsewhere in Mexico. Even this he does poorly. His narratives seem unconnected and disjointed. Old data is often thrown in right next to recent events without any attempt to clarify between the two. The reader does come away with an understanding of the impact of the sever poverty and drug culture, but little to no understanding of the complex interactions that created the murder capital of the world.

Come on Chuck! Having read dozens of interviews, I know you have great information to share. Please write a book that lives up to the title of this one. Let us know you thoughts on the cause of the great violence so that we may hopefully move closer to the solution.

If the angels ever visited Juarez looking for the proverbial one good man, I'm afraid they'd either be kidnapped, murdered, or probably both before their search was over.

In his dark, non-fiction novel, Murder City: Ciudad Juarez and the Global Economy's New Killing Fields, Charles Bowden takes you by the hand and gives a guided tour of one of the lower hells that's just across the border from El Paso, Texas.

On your journey through this third-world dystopia, you travel to an impoverished insane asylum out in the desert ran by El Pastor, who collects from the streets of Juarez those whose lives were shattered by torture, drugs, gang rape, and a host of other horrors. From there you'll visit the "death houses" where underneath floors and patios the anonymous dead wait to be found. You'll cruise the streets at dawn to find the bodies bound with silver and gray duct tape at hands, feet, and mouth, deposited the night before. You'll also meet a sicario, an assassin, who speaks of his childhood, his time in the Mexican state police and the FBI academy, and finally his plunge into "the life" where he has since racked up over 250 murders becoming a highly sought after "murder artist".

At each point on your journey, Bowden stops and makes you look, he makes you bear witness as he has done for almost 20 years, to the unacknowledged, unreported disintegration of not only a city, but of an entire country.

From the nearly ubiquitous corruption in all branches of the Mexican government, military, and police forces to the members of drug cartels living like kings surrounded by grinding poverty to American factories paying starvation wages, Bowden drags it all into the light for us to see.

This book does not pull any punches: While Murder City is a vital, important work, it's also a dark and disturbing read. But throughout it rings true.

Charles Bowden has opened my eyes to a world I could never have imagined prior to reading Murder City.

Take the ride.

I wouldn't characterize Bowden's writing so much as monotonous but rather as relentless in a notable effort to describe the endless chaos that is Juarez. I had the feeling that if Cormac McCarthy turned to journalism, Murder City would be the result. Beneath all of the coverage of Juarez is the lurking apprehension that someday this could be the US of A. Murder City is a story of the pursuit of wealth and the measures people will take to preserve and protect that wealth. It is also a story of the complicity of the USA in perpetuating the chaos that is Juarez. Nothing occurs in isolation.

I bought this book because I was intrigued by the hypothesis that the violence in Juarez is not just a symptom of drug cartel turf battles, but that it is something more, a bellwether of social dissolution brought about by free trade policies and a failure of competent government at all levels. A review I heard on NPR said it would illuminate this linkage, as does the book's jacket. Unfortunately this book never gets there.

As noted by other reviewers, this book is a 300 plus page chronicle of murders over several years. Some revisited repeatedly and all told in a dramatic staccato manner. Use of the abrupt third person voice is a useful tool to set up a narrative, but this is a whole book of it. It's like a car continually revving and never dropping into gear.

Most disappointing for me though is that Bowden never moves on to giving the violence in Juarez a larger context. For instance, there is little discussion of trends in social failure in other similar Mexican border cities. There is no mention of any similar trends on the Canadian side of NAFTA nor any analysis of social problems in similar free trade areas such as Mercosur. In fact the acronym "NAFTA" occurs about 3 times in the whole book.

I see that there is another book on Juarez by Bowden and another author due out soon. Maybe this is where the hypothesis will be explored. I hope so because the book jacket also makes the claim that Bowden is a "Visionary" - and I'm waiting.

As a resident of Southern New Mexico, I live less the 45 minutes from El Paso and what has become the world's most dangerous city, Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. When I came across "Murder City: Cuidad Juarez and the Global Economy's New Killing Fields" by Charles Bowden, I purchased it on the assumption that it was, as the title implied, a book about the current state of affairs across the border.

If that is what it is (arguable), it is presented in the most disguised and confused manner possible.
The title implies a current affairs style journalistic investigation, but in fact what you get is a 350 page travelogue of rambling disorganized pseudo-poetic "stream of consciousness" style narrative! This was my first exposure to the writing of Charles Bowden, and frankly I found his writing style pretentious. The book is full of cryptic "arty" phrases that don't seem to have any context, and frankly makes for very confused reading. After just a few pages it becomes obvious that the writer is obsessed with style at the expense of content! When I finished the book I realized that I had learned absolutely nothing new about Mexico, Juarez, or the ongoing border drug war.

In the end, this book was a profound disappointment. I expected an informed examination by a journalist. What I got was self indulgent drivel.

I LIVE IN EL PASO. THE AUTHOR KEPT EMPHASIZING THE HORROR OF THIS AREA. 15 MINUTES FROM MY HOME I WOULD BE IN THE MOST DANGEROUS CITY IN THE WORLD. NO ONE WHO LIVES IN THIS CITY IS UNTOUCHED BY THE "HOLOCOST" GOING ON IN JUAREZ. PERSONALLY I KNOW OF TWO VICTIMS OF THE ATROCITIES. AN 8 YEAR OLD LITTLE BOY AND A YOUNG WOMAN WHO WAS EIGHT MONTHS PREGNANT AND HAD A TWO YEAR OLD BABY. BOTH WERE AMERICAN CITIZENS. THESE KILLINGS HAVE BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS AND MOST AMERICANS ARE UNAWARE. I BELIEVE THE AUTHOR IS NOT ONLY TELLING THE STORY BUT REPEATING AND REPEATING THE STORY BECAUSE NO ONE SEEMS TO GET IT (or if they do, don't seem to care). MAYBE IT WILL TAKE A SLAUGHTER IN THE STREETS OF EL PASO TO CALL ATTENTION TO IT. EVEN WRITING THIS REVIEW GIVES ME PAUSE. WILL I BE THE NEXT TARGET? THE DRUG LORDS ARE ABOVE THE LAW AND EVEN SADDER, AMERICA IS THEIR BEST CUSTOMER.

Wow Mr Bowden's book floored me, I couldn't put the thing down I finished it in about 3 days. I imagine some people will have problems with Bowden's style, he writes about his experiences in a non-linear way sometimes repeating small fragments I believe the style reinforces the chaotic life he experienced in Juarez. Instead of trying to give us the who's who of cartels and connections Bowden's premise is that the killings are illustrative not of a break down of society but of a new form largely without rhyme or reason. This book is about the future and the ability of people to live with the world collapsing around them. Excellent highly reccomended!

Bowden shows the nightmare that is Ciudad Juarez in vivid, beautiful prose. He is one of the most talented contemporary writers in any genre. Readers who enjoy writers like Truman Capote, Michael Herr, and Mark Bowden will love this book.
While the governments and elites of the US and Mexico pretend to be fighting a war on drugs the Mexican government and army are in fact fighting a war for drugs. Juarez is more dangerous than Baghdad or Mogadishu, and it takes great courage for any journalist to go there and witness and then tell the truth. Bowden has great compassion for the citizens of Juarez who are just trying to live their lives in peace and raise their families, living in a hellish city disintegrating into anarchy. Every politician and politician should read this book before presuming to understand the drug trade and illegal immigration. Can they handle the truth?

At the time I am writing this, there was only one other review, which gave the book a two-star rating. After finishing the Kindle edition,I have to say that I feel the other rating is unfair. At first I agreed with the other reviewer- and I had really wanted to like this book, after hearing a very moving interview with the author on NPR. The narrative in the beginning feels disjointed, and I found the constant references to "Miss Sinaloa" to be annoying. But stay with it, the book draws you in. As I read farther, I really began to understand how "Miss Sinaloa" is a metaphor for the City; she is beautiful, but insane and terribly damaged. And, in the end, the Author's imagining of an "Our Town" type play with the Sinaloa murder vicims as characters moved me to tears. I don't know if all the readers will agree with the author about some of the underlying reasons for the murders, but the book is interesting, provacitive- and worth reading.