Both well written and well documented, this book provides a basic history of the US-Saudi Relationship, a relationship that basically spans the existence of the country. A sizable chunk of the book deals with the oil industry and this section of the book is especially illuminating, as foreign companies and governments behaved very differently in Saudi Arabia than in neighboring countries. The analysis of the oil industry's comportment in Saudi Arabia would have seemed almost too rosy to me, but I have read similar accounts from several others sources. Although the United States has dealt much more fairly with Saudi Arabia than with many other countries, this book left me somewhat depressed. It brings up so many compelling questions: Is it right for the US to deal with a government that is both non-democratic and sometimes downright repressive? Was there a way for this wealthy though sparsely populated country to protect itself without US involvement? Do the huge levels of unemployment breed fundamentalism in this wealthy country as poverty and class disparity seem to in poorer countries? I could go on. Lippman's book doesn't provide the answers; it is much more history than current analysis or policy-suggestion, but certainly worth reading for inspiring such reflection.

Accept for the major caveat at the end, the book deserves the full 5-star rating, particularly since there are so many polemical and false books on the Kingdom available. Mr. Lippman has taken the time to interview numerous Americans and some Saudis on their interactions. His book chronicles the Saudi - American partnership, which he correctly asserts in the Prologue: "The people of Saudi Arabia have benefited, not suffered, from the American presence." He structures his book into various chapters focusing on different economic sectors. Naturally this begins `at the beginning,' with the discovery of oil in the Eastern Province in the `30's. (An excellent complement to these chapters is Stegner's book, "Discovery!"). Other chapters however break new ground, and cover sectors not discussed in other books, specifically the creation of SAMA (the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency), with the concurrent development on a modern monetary system; the introduction of radio and TV; TWA's development of a modern airline system, along with the national carrier, Saudia; the Ford foundation's participation, and ultimate failure in developing governmental systems along American lines; the unusual background, and even more unusual function of JECOR (US-Saudi Arabian Joint Economic Commission) in which US government employees worked in an advisory role in virtually all the Saudi ministries. Personally I found the chapter "Down on the Farm" the most informative and fascinating, and it started with a tall blonde woman, age 23, arriving in Al-Kharj in 1950 to help manage a farm with her husband. Naturally there was also an informative chapter on the involvement of the US military in the development of their Saudi counterpart. More briefly, probably through lack of contacts, he covers those who worked at American schools as well as the medical sector. Regrettably, one of his chief medical references was Dr. Seymour Gray. As Mr. Lippman says about his serious lapses in medical ethics: "American doctors generally refrain from discussing their patients in public, at least by name, but no such compunction inhibited Seymour Gray (p 261).

Another excellent aspect of this book is that he updates two of the classic accounts of Saudi Arabia, Lacey's "The Kingdom," and Holden and Johns "The House of Saud," with chapters which cover the impact of the two Gulf Wars, as well as the impact on 9-11 on American-Saudi relations. By interviewing so many Americans who chose to work in Saudi Arabia, one is treated to snippets of insights into their own motivations for going to the Kingdom, and why for those who made the necessary cultural adjustment, they considered the country an attractive place to live. He renders a balanced assessment by Richard E. Undeland, an USIA employee who said: "there was much that was right, admirable, and promising" in Saudi Arabia. More tellingly still, there is a vignette involving General William H Riley Jr., in which he learns from the Saudis, as opposed to the normally assumed role that Americans can only teach; that the Saudis have nothing to teach us. (p 293). In three other separate chapters he deals with issues along that so-called, as well as the very real cultural divide, include Christian and Jewish practices in the Kingdom, and some of those Westerners who were caught up in the Kingdom's judicial system.

And therein lays the caveat. Lippman correctly reports the strong reluctance of any Saudi to admit the evolvement of their compatriots in the 9-11 attacks. Likewise there is a strong reluctance to admit that an American caught up in the Saudi judicial system might actually be guilty, or would fabricate how he was treated. Lippman got completely snookered in the case of Scott Nelson, as did the rest of the US media, even though this enormous red flag was flying, which Lippman reported. Nelson submitted a phony diploma indicating that he had an electrical engineering degree from MIT in order to secure a position as "monitoring systems engineer" at King Faisal Specialist Hospital. Lippman calls this action a "serious mistake," (p229) though stronger descriptions might be more appropriate. Why, oh why wouldn't a journalist not wonder that if Nelson lied about his credentials, and produced phony documents, what else might he lie about? Ask a few follow-up questions: What exactly is Nelson's educational background? Did he have any sort of education, or more importantly, did he possess any sort of KNOWLEDGE that would justify his assumption of the position of "monitoring systems engineer."? It would be a few short steps until the journalist asked Nelson the following: Perhaps you are the largest safety violation at the hospital, not the allegedly improperly connected gas lines? The lawyer defending HCA in this case did such a background check, uncovering a serial pattern of deception, which is one of the reasons the charges against the company were dismissed. Lippman could still review this case, not for the insights it might reveal about the Saudis, but for those about ourselves, and that "Orientalism" framework that we view events in the Middle East.

This author describes an interesting history of Saudi Arabia and its relations with the U.S. The book traces the Saudi-American alliance from its emergence after the birth of the Kingdom in 1932 and the signing a year later of the first oil-prospecting agreement with Standard Oil of California up until the present time, ending with a discussion of the strategic ties that bind the United States and Saudi Arabia. In particular, it describes the experience of many Americans who have worked in the Kingdom, giving particularly unique insight for instance into what it was like for many to work for Aramco, to be a wife of an Aramco worker, to be married to a Saudi male, or be involved in one of many other possible relations involving folks from the US and Saudi Arabia. Thomas W. Lippman is an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington. In four years as the Washington Post's Middle East bureau chief, three years as the Post's oil and energy reporter and a decade as the newspaper's national security and diplomatic correspondent, he has traveled extensively to Saudi Arabia. In all, he has spent more than thirty years as a reporter, editor, and foreign correspondent for The Washington Post, specializing in Middle Eastern affairs and American foreign policy. He is known for and described as writing in a very even-handed manner. Unlike most other books I have read, the author remains respectful towards the Saudi people. One of many messages that I got from his book is that some Americans have not been able to adapt to life in Saudi Arabia while others have done amazingly well at settling into the unique and very different culture. Americans who have been able to adjust to life in the Kingdom showed a great willingness to bend to Saudi's cultural norms and a willingness to reach out (and frequently live) outside of the compounds and/or otherwise seek opportunities to actually connect with Saudis. For instance, he talks of the Nance Museum in Missouri, perhaps the only museum dedicated to traditional Saudi Arabian art and crafts in the U.S., developed by a former Aramco couple (the Nances) who simply fell in love with the native traditions. Although Lippman acknowledges that there are a lot of problems in Saudi Arabia which they must face and resolve, he generally shows the Saudis in a very positive light. He has travelled to Saudi Arabia a number of times since September 11 and his last chapter discusses changes in Saudi culture since this terror attack. In the paperback version he has added an additional chapter. Lippman is a very responsible writer, taking seriously the affect he knows his words can have upon the reader. His love for the US is clear. However, he is not arrogant about his nationality. He also shows sympathy and agreement with many of the complaints registered by Arabs, while not being an apologetic. He is among the most diplomatic of all authors on Saudi Arabia and he concludes his book with at least the possibility for hope. Lastly, while admitting the need for real change - both in the U.S. and in Saudi Arabia - he doesn't feel the need to resort to cheap alarmist warnings.

This author describes an interesting history of Saudi Arabia and its relations with the U.S. The book traces the Saudi-American alliance from its emergence after the birth of the Kingdom in 1932 and the signing a year later of the first oil-prospecting agreement with Standard Oil of California up until the present time, ending with a discussion of the strategic ties that bind the United States and Saudi Arabia. In particular, it describes the experience of many Americans who have worked in the Kingdom, giving particularly unique insight for instance into what it was like for many to work for Aramco, to be a wife of an Aramco worker, to be married to a Saudi male, or be involved in one of many other possible relations involving folks from the US and Saudi Arabia. Thomas W. Lippman is an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington. In four years as the Washington Post's Middle East bureau chief, three years as the Post's oil and energy reporter and a decade as the newspaper's national security and diplomatic correspondent, he has traveled extensively to Saudi Arabia. In all, he has spent more than thirty years as a reporter, editor, and foreign correspondent for The Washington Post, specializing in Middle Eastern affairs and American foreign policy. He is known for and described as writing in a very even-handed manner. Unlike most other books I have read, the author remains respectful towards the Saudi people. One of many messages that I got from his book is that some Americans have not been able to adapt to life in Saudi Arabia while others have done amazingly well at settling into the unique and very different culture. Americans who have been able to adjust to life in the Kingdom showed a great willingness to bend to Saudi's cultural norms and a willingness to reach out (and frequently live) outside of the compounds and/or otherwise seek opportunities to actually connect with Saudis. For instance, he talks of the Nance Museum in Missouri, perhaps the only museum dedicated to traditional Saudi Arabian art and crafts in the U.S., developed by a former Aramco couple (the Nances) who simply fell in love with the native traditions. Although Lippman acknowledges that there are a lot of problems in Saudi Arabia which they must face and resolve, he generally shows the Saudis in a very positive light. He has travelled to Saudi Arabia a number of times since September 11 and his last chapter discusses changes in Saudi culture since this terror attack. In the paperback version he has added an additional chapter. Lippman is a very responsible writer, taking seriously the affect he knows his words can have upon the reader. His love for the US is clear. However, he is not arrogant about his nationality. He also shows sympathy and agreement with many of the complaints registered by Arabs, while not being an apologetic. He is among the most diplomatic of all authors on Saudi Arabia and he concludes his book with at least the possibility for hope. Lastly, while admitting the need for real change - both in the U.S. and in Saudi Arabia - he doesn't feel the need to resort to cheap alarmist warnings.