Medieval Warfare (History of the Art of War, Vol 3)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sort customer reviews by: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Show All Reviews on Page
Hide All Reviews on Page
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medieval Warfare (History of the Art of War, Vol 3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the eighth century through the Middle Ages feudalism determined the nature of European warfare. Medieval Warfare begins in the time of Charlemagne, who maintained a military system of freemen and of vassals bound to him in service for lands granted in fief. These pages are crowded with recreations of famous events like the Battle of Hastings and movements like the Crusades; with the brightest flowers of knighthood, and with the mercenary grandeur of Byzantium.
Hans Delbrück shows how feudal military organization varied in different countries and why the knightly forces could not hold up against the barbarous Normans. He studies military developments in the kingdoms that rose with the collapse of the Carolingian Empire, as well as the trend toward mercenary armies. When the Swiss peasants, forming the first true infantry, defeated the Burgundian knights in the fourteenth century, the era of modern warfare had begun. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 1 of 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Review Date |
Review Rating(5 High) |
Review Helpful to: |
Customer Review | Reviewer Info |
Permanent Link |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews Below Sorted by Newest First | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-26-02 | 4 | 4\6 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is in this volume that Delbruck's sense of racial superiority shows the most. Although the longest volume in the work it deals almost exclusively with warfare among medieval Germans. He virtually ignores the Crusades, the Reconquista, the Hundred Years War, and Manzikert. His argument against including the Crusades is that they did not do anything to change warfare in Europe, but later mentions that the English experiences in Syria led to the development of the long-bow. This definitely should have been explored more.
The best move Delbruck could have made to improve this volume would have been to split it into two books. Had he done that he could have dealt with the Hundred Years War in the same way that he dealt with the Punic Wars, gone into more detail about the Crusades, explored the Reconquista and the Norman migrations, and given the Byzantine Empire the focus it deserves. Delbruck's analysis of the Swiss (whom he constantly refers to as "German") contribution to modern warfare is amazing, however, and makes the work worth reading. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-09-25 08:39:22 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 1 of 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Books | Arts | Biography | Click Here For An A-Z Index Of All 213 Best-Seller Subjects | Business | Children's | Comics | ||||||
| Computers | Cooking | Engineering | Entertainment | Health | History | Home | Horror | Humor | Law | Fiction | Medicine | Mystery |
| Nonfiction | Outdoors | Parenting | Professional | Reference | Religion | Romance | Science | Sci-Fi | Sports | Teens | Travel | |