Snitch: Informants, Cooperators, and the Corruption of Justice
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sort customer reviews by: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Show All Reviews on Page
Hide All Reviews on Page
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Snitch: Informants, Cooperators, and the Corruption of Justice | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our criminal justice system favors defendants who know how to play the "5K game": criminals who are so savvy about the cooperation process that they repeatedly commit serious crimes knowing they can be sent back to the streets if they simply cooperate with prosecutors. In Snitch, investigative reporter Ethan Brown shows through a compelling series of case profiles how the sentencing guidelines for drug-related offenses, along with the 5K1.1 section, have unintentionally created a "cottage industry of cooperators," and led to fabricated evidence. The result is wrongful convictions and appallingly gruesome crimes, including the grisly murder of the Harvey family in Richmond, Virginia and the well-publicized murder of Imette St. Guillen in New York City.
This cooperator-coddling criminal justice system has ignited the infamous "Stop Snitching" movement in urban neighborhoods, deplored by everyone from the NAACP to the mayor of Boston for encouraging witness intimidation. But as Snitch shows, the movement is actually a cry against the harsh sentencing guidelines for drug-related crimes, and a call for hustlers to return to "old school" street values, like: do the crime, do the time. Combining deep knowledge of the criminal justice system with frontline true crime reporting, Snitch is a shocking and brutally troubling report about the state of American justice when it's no longer clear who are the good guys and who are the bad. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 5 of 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Review Date |
Review Rating(5 High) |
Review Helpful to: |
Customer Review | Reviewer Info |
Permanent Link |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews Below Sorted by Newest First | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10-05-08 | 5 | 0\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regardless of your views on the subjects at hand, it is hard to argue with the cases presented in this book as anything less then interesting and often times provocative. Divisive and dangerous as the issue of "snitching" in the criminal justice sector and the rewards it brings, this book provides plenty of examples of what can and does go wrong.
While all good things must come to an end, I'd love to eventually see a expansion upon this book and its premise. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-11-14 08:01:42 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01-31-08 | 5 | 1\2 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Highly recommended read. I don't know where Brown's from but he definitely delivers a horrifically accurate image of growing up in drug-plagued New York in the 80's in Queens Reigns Supreme. In this recent work, Snitch, Brown tackles the flaws in police-informant relationships. Specifically, the measures informants reach when their freedom's at stake. Brown also sheds light on the dangers of stat-hungry prosecutors purely seeking conviction numbers before justice. If you have the slightest interest in criminal justice (or injustice) buy, borrow or steal this book. This is the ugly truth to the story of police cooperation....I wish this book would been published prior to the hype around Stop Snitching so it could have served as some sort of reference....one thing's for sure, Cam'ron is still a jackass. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-10-05 08:38:20 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01-24-08 | 5 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an excellent and completely horrifying book. Academic critics like Prof. William Stuntz have documented the "pathological politics" of federal criminal law - an "iron triangle" relationship in which (1) the electorate induces (2) the legislative branch to increase the prosecutorial power of (3) the executive at the expense of the poor, withering judiciary. Sentencing guidelines -and especially stiff mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders- have raised the stakes of trial immensely. When defendants are given the choice to either: A) plead guilty to 1-2 years behind bars or B) exercise their constitutional right to trial and risk decades, it's simply no wonder that fewer and fewer cases make it into the courtroom. And this means less transparency, fewer appeals, less judicial review, and...yes...WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS! If, as Brandeis had it, "sunlight is the best disinfectant" who knows what is now growing in the darkness?
There can be no doubt that the current regime has turned US Attorneys into Grand Inquisitors. But should we worry? Why not "just trust the Government?" After all, there can be no witchhunts without false accusations and false confessions, right? This is where Ethan Brown's book makes a truly original contribution, and to my mind delivers the coup de grace to the existing federal system. The author demonstrates how that system runs on a strict and steady diet of "incentivized witnesses" - snitches in common parlance. Mandatory minimums can be a great incentive to lie and exaggerate if you are a "target" looking to roll over on your associates. But they also create perverse secondary incentives - in federal investigators and prosecutors - to skip the expensive and boring independent investigation. When all these snitches are coming to you with free eyewitness information, why bother with the hard police work? Brown persausively and devastatingly argues that the snitch has become a crutch for the Government, to the severe detriment of the rights of the accused and the integrity of the system. This is an extremely important book because it is written from the perspective of a serious journalist for the lay public. Practitioners frequently lose the perspective to see how truly bizzare and unfair the system has become. The public, on the other hand, can't be expected to take much interest in the various subsection headings of the US Code. Ethan Brown bridges the gap for the lay public, and one can only hope this book brings some attention to this Kafkaesque nightmare. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-01-31 11:10:59 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01-24-08 | 5 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an excellent and completely horrifying book. Academic critics like Prof. William Stuntz have extensively documented the "pathological politics" of federal criminal law - an "iron triangle" relationship in which (1) the electorate induces (2) the legislative branch to increase the prosecutorial power of (3) the executive at the expense of the poor, withering judiciary. Sentencing guidelines -and especially stiff mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders- have raised the stakes of trial immensely. Where for example a defendant is given the choice to either: A) plead guilty to 1-2 years behind bars or B) exercise his constitutional right to trial and thereby risk 30 (!), it is simply no wonder that fewer and fewer cases make it into the courtroom. And this means less transparency, fewer appeals, less judicial review, and...yes...WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS! If, as Brandeis had it, "sunlight is the best disinfectant" who now knows what is growing in the darkness?
There can be no doubt that the current regime has turned US Attorneys into Grand Inquisitors. But should we worry? Why not "just trust the Government?" After all, there can be no witchhunts without false confession and false accusation, right? This is where Ethan Brown's book makes a truly original contribution, and to my mind the coup de grace for the existing federal system. The author demonstrates how that system runs on a strict and steady diet of "incentivized witnesses" - snitches in common parlance. Mandatory minimums can be a great incentive to lie and exaggerate if you are a "target" looking to roll over on your associates. But they also create perverse secondary incentives - in federal investigators and prosecutors - to skip the expensive and boring independant investigation. When all these snitches are coming to you with free eyewitness information, why bother with the hard police work? Brown persausively and devastatingly argues that the snitch has become a crutch for the Government, to the severe detriment of the rights of the accused and the integrity of the system. This is an extremely important book because it is written from the perspective of a serious journalist for the lay public. Practitioners frequently lose the perspective to see how truly bizzare and unfair the system has become. The public, on the other hand, can't be expected to take much interest in the various subsection headings of the US Code. Ethan Brown bridges the gap for the lay public, and one can only hope this book brings some attention to this Kafkaesque nightmare. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-01-24 14:32:32 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12-03-07 | 5 | 1\2 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Snitch is a must read. With the current fascination with gangsters in America, and gangsta rap read what really goes on behind the scenes. All the bravado and thuggish attitudes is just for show because when these so-called gangstas get behind closed doors they are snitches on whoever and whatever, fabricating and lying on people. That is the truth of American Justice and Ethan shows it all with no punches." [...]
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-01-24 14:32:32 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 5 of 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Books | Arts | Biography | Click Here For An A-Z Index Of All 213 Best-Seller Subjects | Business | Children's | Comics | ||||||
| Computers | Cooking | Engineering | Entertainment | Health | History | Home | Horror | Humor | Law | Fiction | Medicine | Mystery |
| Nonfiction | Outdoors | Parenting | Professional | Reference | Religion | Romance | Science | Sci-Fi | Sports | Teens | Travel | |