The Last Campaign: Robert F. Kennedy and 82 Days That Inspired America
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sort customer reviews by: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Show All Reviews on Page
Hide All Reviews on Page
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Last Campaign: Robert F. Kennedy and 82 Days That Inspired America | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amazon Best of the Month, June 2008: When Senator Robert F. Kennedy entered the presidential race during the chaotic year of 1968, anarchy appeared to be gathering on the horizon. America was coming to grips with an unwinnable war in Vietnam and unacceptable social policies at home. Exclusive Q&A with Author Thurston Clarke
Clarke: The fact that he was the brother of a beloved and martyred president, and that he was also assassinated are of course important factors. But I think Bobby Kennedy continues to be relevant because he tackled issues such as race, poverty, and an ill-advised and unpopular war that remain relevant. And not only did he address these issues but he addressed them with an honesty and passion that no other president or politician has equaled since 1968. Amazon.com: Despite his own fears, Kennedy made himself dangerously accessible to crowds. Was this an act of defiance or conviction? Clarke: It was both defiance and conviction. Speaking of President Johnson's bubble-topped, bulletproof limousine, he told a reporter, "I'll tell you one thing: if I'm elected President, you won't find me riding around in any of those God-damned cars. We can't have that kind of country, where the President is afraid to go among the people." When his aides (who were worried about his safety throughout the campaign) urged him to spend more time campaigning from television studios and less time plunging into crowds, he told them, "There are so many people who hate me that I've got to let the people who love me see me." Kennedy also knew that crowds revived him-"like a couple of drinks," according to aide Fred Dutton-and that letting people see him in person was the best way to prove that his reputation for being "ruthless" was unmerited. Amazon.com: Hypothetical questions achingly surround Bobby Kennedy and his legacy. Did any single "What if?" occupy your thoughts as you researched this book? Kennedy campaigning in Los Angeles during 1968 Clarke: Several "What ifs" haunted me. Kennedy had wanted to avoid going to the Ambassador Hotel on the evening of June 4, 1968 and instead watch the returns at the home of John Frankenheimer. The networks, however, protested that they needed him at the hotel for interviews and wanted to cover the victory celebration live if he won. Kennedy caved in and went to the hotel. Kennedy always went through the crowd in a ballroom or auditorium after speaking, and became angry with aides who tried to hustle him out a back door. But on the night of his assassination, he broke his own rule and went through the hotel pantry where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting. And what if he had won the nomination and become president? I doubt that there would have been riots at the Democratic convention in Chicago that year -- riots that helped elect Richard Nixon to the presidency and that have proven to be an albatross around the neck of Democrats for forty years. A President Robert Kennedy would have withdrawn America from Vietnam soon and there would be fewer names on the Vietnam wall. There would have been no bombing of Cambodia, Kent State, or Watergate, and so on, and so on. Amazon.com: Kennedy's campaign strategy was fraught with risk, as one observer remarked that "he kept hammering away at the plight of the poor when there was more chance for political loss than gain." Had Bobby simply had enough with politics as usual? Clarke: Kennedy's obsession with the plight of America's poor was more the result of his own personal experiences than any rejection of politics as usual. He had held a starving child in his arms in Mississippi. He had visited the appalling schools on Indian reservations where students learned nothing about their own culture and history. He had tramped through tenements in Brooklyn and come upon a girl whose face had been disfigured by rat bites. He believed that he had a responsibility to educate the American people about these conditions. During a flight on his chartered campaign plane he told Sylvia Wright of Life magazine, ". . . for every two or three days that you waste time making speeches at rallies full of noise and balloons, there's usually a chance every two or three days . . . where you get a chance to teach people something; and to tell them something that they don't know because they don't have the chance to get around like I do, to take them some place vicariously that they haven't been, to show them a ghetto, or an Indian reservation." And it was moments like these, Kennedy told Wright, that made a political campaign, despite all its banalities and indignities, "worth it." Amazon.com: In your opinion, will we ever see another Bobby Kennedy? Have we become too jaded to embrace a candidate like RFK or has campaigning simply become political theater? Clarke: One of the aides who scheduled many of Kennedy's appearances that spring, told me, "What he did was not really that mystical. All it requires is someone who knows himself, and has some courage." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 26 of 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Review Date |
Review Rating(5 High) |
Review Helpful to: |
Customer Review | Reviewer Info |
Permanent Link |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews Below Sorted by Newest First | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-13-08 | 5 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One of the best campaign books I have ever read. As he did in "Ask Not," Thurston Clark brings out the back-story of a great moment in history. In this case, RFK's decision to run for president, despite his many misgivings about doing so. It chronicles his determination to run the way he wanted to - not the ways the polls and pols told him to run. Ultimately, though, "The Last Campaign" shows us what a real leader looks like and ought to behave. With his characteristic bluntness, RFK didn't shirk from reminding people that in a democracy, everyone is responsible for the country's actions. One cannot blame Washington for their problems without holding themselves just as accountable. Sadly, as Clark cites in the book, no politician from any party could get away with such an attitude today.
A great book about a great man. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-08-21 01:48:01 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-13-08 | 3 | 1\3 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If I were rating Bobby, there aren't enough stars in the heavens to measure how I feel about him. I was 17 when he died, and I don't think I have taken politics seriously since. Even the left of center Democrats I usually agree with on policy seem pale, scheming elitists compared to Bobby. So do the other Kennedys actually. Someone, I think Jack Newfield, has argued that Bobby Kennedy's murder was the most tragic event of the 1960s. That if you could go back in time and stop only one of the three murders that defined the decade, it would be Bobby, because he is the one who was still growing, whose work was not nearly complete already. He seems to be the one, who, had he lived, would have really been an agent for change. The book however, is slight, more a compilation of admiring stories than anything else. Granted the book is a look at a very brief part of Bobby's life and not a full scale biography, but the author Thurston Clark does not go into much about Kennedy's past, and what set him on that road to the Ambassador Hotel. He also assumes thoughout that had Kennedy lived he would have been elected president. I doubt it, the old machine politics still ruled. The question it seems to me, is how much more vigorous the anti-movement would have been with Bobby as part of it, possibly forcing Humphrey or Nixon to end the Vietnam war quicker, to even to act more aggressively against poverty and hunger in America. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-08-21 01:48:01 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-11-08 | 4 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Enjoyed this a lot, gave me a great insight to a side of RFK I'd never known about. So much so that I had some problems that he really behaved as portrayed during this campaign. Very hard to imagine him crying openly at the sight of poor children and spontaneously going over and hugging some of them. But on the other hand, having 9 or 10 of his own,guess that side of him could come to the surface. Guess the residue of all the tough portrayals of him as Attorney General linger on. If all of this is true and accurate, makes me enormously sad that he didn't live to become President as it certainly seemed that's where he was definitely headed.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-14 00:52:47 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-09-08 | 5 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The Last Campaign" by Thurston Clarke is the excellenly-written story of Robert Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign. While many older Americans--including Tom Brokaw, who's praise can be found on the book's back cover--have called Clarke's study of Kennedy's campaign the first book to truly 'bring them back' to 1968, I think that Clarke's book is more important for younger readers. As a college student myself, I knew nothing of the chaos of the 1960s except what I had learned in a classroom and seen in movies and on poorly-produced television shows. In my previous encounters with media dealing with the 1960s, no document ever made me feel anything about the subject except fascination, until I read Clarke's book. Clarke's writing about RFK's '68 campaign evokes in its readers all of the emotions--excitement, fear, joy, anger, sadness--that the 1960s produced in those Americans who lived through them. In the end, Clarke's story is a description of an ideal political candidate, one who said what needed to be said even when it wasn't prescient, and who treated every American as his brother. That is ultimately something that America's youth need to experience, not so that they know the way things were in the 1960s, but so that they can understand what is possible today.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-11 12:32:06 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-08-08 | 5 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unlike most Kennedy books which show the faults of the brothers and the family at large, this excellent book shows a man who campaigned for president in manner unheard of before and unlikely to be done again. Although Bobby Kennedy is known for hanging out with the glamour crowd, he spent he took his quest to the inner-city ghetto, the Indian reservations and the mining towns. He confronted the well-off and challenged colllege students. He formed an unlikely colition of angry white workers and black millitants. He went into the ghettos of Indianapolis on the night of the King assasination and may have prevented a dangerous riot. If he would have gotten the Democratic nod for president, he quite possibly (unless the Nixon camp could launch a successful smear campaign against him) could have become our greatest president. Hats off to Thurston Clarke!
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-11 12:32:06 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-07-08 | 5 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Robert F. Kennedy was often seen as an aggressive, abusive, arrogant man--and there were times he certainly was. But his brother's assassination seemed to soften him, giving him an insight into suffering which the author compares to Abraham Lincoln's. Kennedy could empathize with the suffering of others.
This led him, during his campaign for the presidency in 1968, to seek out those who suffered and to promise to help. A large part of RFK's greatness is that he was sincere. He meant what he said, and there is every reason to believe he would have tried to keep these promises. Of course, we'll never know how well he might have done--or if he would have been a great president. That's part of his greatness, too. Minorities, the poor of all races, and the young were all drawn to his message of hope. People were crazy about him. Many of those around him compared his celebrity to that of the Beatles. Crowds would tear at him and his clothes and leave him covered with scratches. Yet Kennedy loved being out there among them. In the back of his mind, though, he knew that eventually, someone would try to kill him. Thurston Clarke's book is eloquently written, highly insightful, and hard to put down. It should be required reading for Barack Obama and John McCain and anyone else who runs for the presidency. They would learn a thing or two about honesty, sincerity, and compassion. "For all the words of tongue or pen, The saddest are these: 'It might have been.'" John Greenleaf Whittier (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-10 17:35:32 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 07-07-08 | 5 | 3\4 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Probably many Americans still play the "What if ... " game when it comes to historical events. What if the Mayflower blew off course and went too far south? What if Roosevelt was defeated in 1940? What if Martin Luther King survived his assassination attempt? What if Bobby did? Probably one of the most haunting "what if's" our country could ever have would be the last one, and Thurston Clarke's examination of the too-short presidential campaign of 1968 is a "what iffers" dream.
Being a fan of RFK, I must admit to how much I didn't know about his presidential campaign prior to reading this book. It's a thorough, complete recounting of the 82 days, from his announcement to his killing, of the events on the trail. The book takes us through the Indiana primary, where RFK defied conventions and campaigned the way he wanted to. We go with him to the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation where he befriends a boy that stays by his side during the entire day he's there. Oregon fails to roll out a welcome mat, while California has a red carpet for him. We see him in tough audiences, and in mobs where people can't wait to touch him. Bobby was many things to many people. By covering his schedule, we also come to terms with the man who was Bobby Kennedy as well. Throughout the book, Clarke allows us insights into his persona and character, through conversations with people who knew him, and extensive quoting by the candidate himself. RFK clearly had many different sides, but the one I shall always remember is reading about RFK meeting children in abject poverty, and cradling their diseased and dying bodies in tears. Clarke's book starts out with a recounting, in a prologue, about the train ride that took RFK's body back to Washington for burial. This probably was one of the best prologues I had ever read in any book. It was so moving and eloquently written that I actually read it twice. It sets up the book perfectly, as he describes the countless people who came out to stand along the train ride back, honoring the man who died trying to make our country better. It's a moving tribute to him that I shall never forget. So, we play the "what if" game. Would our country have been better off with RFK in the White House? What would have happened, and what wouldn't have happened, with our political system? No one knows. We can only ponder. After reading this book, it only makes me wonder even more. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-10 17:35:32 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-29-08 | 5 | 3\3 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As much as I respect Robert Kennedy I find it difficult to read any book about him because I know how his life story will end. While he could have spent a life of ease with his family and money, instead he chose to help those, such as the African Americans and Native Americans, who were often neglected by our affluent society. He found it abhorrent that citizens in Mississippi or on the Pine Ridge Indian reservation in South Dakota were often without enough food to live on. He chose to spend time with people in such dire straits even though he knew many of them didn't vote. I got the feeling that Robert Kennedy campaigned recklessly almost defying an assassin to strike him down as he rode standing up in a convertible and mingling with the people. If this was the price he had to pay to serve America then so be it. In the end he chose to exit the Ambassador Hotel ballroom in Los Angeles in a manner his handlers didn't approve of. Of such seemingly trivial choices is history changed. We are left to wonder if Robert Kennedy would have received the Democratic nomination for president in 1968, and more importantly, how the Vietnam War and American history would have been different. America was robbed of a truly caring individual in a senseless tragedy. The 1960s was a time of an unpopular war, riots, and assassinations for America as anyone who lived through it knows very well. Author Thurston Clarke has provided us with an outstanding offering in The Last Campaign which reviews a time of cautious hope that ended in unfortunate tragedy. Whether you lived through this time period or not, this is the story about a man who did his absolute best to be of service to others.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-07 09:56:45 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-25-08 | 5 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was born in 1970 so don't have first hand perspective of the 60s or RFKs presidential campaign. However, I've always been fascinated by the decade, one of the most tumultuous, calamitous and important decades in our country's history. While many figures loom large over the 60s, one can make the case that the two figures who loom largest over that decade are MLK and RFK. They carried the hope and promise that JFK ushered in with his presidency until the latter part of the decade and their assassinations slammed shut that optimism a mere two months apart.
Clarke does a masterful job capturing the gestalt of the time pitch perfectly and the impact of RFKs presidential campaign through the course of those 82 days. To start, one must realize the difference in presidential elections today vs. this time period. The primaries were not nearly as important as they are today. The political machine still dominated the party selection process and Kennedy faced near insurmountable challenges as he entered the race from the Democratic party establishment. He recognized that he had to basically hit a home run in the remaining primaries to convince delegates to turn their support to him because of popular support of Democratic votes. May of the establishment viewed him as "ruthless" and "opportunistic" and we see how this was reinforced after McCarthy's surprise showing in New Hampshire and Kennedy's decision to jump in the race soon after that. I found Clarke's account of Kennedy's announcement and first speech at Kansas State moving. Today, politicians stump speeches are carefully crafted, crowds controlled to ensure no hostile questions and control so tight to prevent any extemporaneous occurrence that might spread like wildfire across the internet. Kansas State was not that environment and Kennedy demonstrated the traits and attributes during that night that would make his improbable run to the Presidency become an almost certain nomination as he won the California primary (and started to convince the party machine that he should be the Democratic nominee). Clarke captures all the inherent contradictions of RFK -- his strengths, weaknesses -- and one gets a close personal "ride" through the whirlwind campaign trail. We see an RFK haunted by JFK's assassination and the realization that the same fate might befall him. (Clarke shares moments of balloons popping or other similar situations that caused RFK to recoil as if a gun was shot) We witness Kennedy's disdain for public speaking, comfort with the poor and under-privileged, moral conviction about race and poverty as central campaign themes, in spite of the advice of his advisers. We relive his campaign and amazing victory in Indiana - including the night of April 4th in Indianapolis when he stood in front of an African-American crowd in the inner city (a place the police refused to go to provide him protection that night) and probably was as big a reason Indianapolis was spared the riots that broke out across almost all other major American cities. I wish this book didn't end - then again, that is much similar to the legacy that RFK left and especially his presidential campaign. We are left wondering what if to many questions - knowing that if RFK had lived, certainly the course of the following months of 1968 would have been different, maybe even the next four or eight years. Hope and optimism would give way to despair and disillusionment - more violence and death in Southeast Asia and at Kent State, Watergate - and we are forced to relive those 82 days and only imagine "What if". (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-01 12:04:18 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-25-08 | 5 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thurston Clarke has written one of the most emotionally charged and inspiring books I have ever read. I was 9 years old when RFK was assassinated, much too young to understand the ramifications. I do remember my older sister sobbing uncontrollably, and just repeating, they killed him, they killed him. RFK's Last Campaign was his legacy and he knew it, he knew the day would come that he would be assasinated yet he strove to raise all of us up. Up to a higher standard of caring for each other and raising the conciousness of this nation up. RFK asked, I dream of things that never were, and ask why not? He gave and he gave until he had no more to give and then he rested and got back to work. A couragous leader who was different because he spoke as to what he truly believed and he truly believed what he spoke. Rarely have I ever felt so much emotion while reading a book, RFK's soul and spirit are truly captured in this gem of a book. It made me think hard about what I can do to be a better person and examine my own moral courage. RFK defined moral courage and we can only ask ourselves, what if RFK had been president?
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-01 12:04:18 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-24-08 | 4 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So long as you realize up front that this book is something of a manifesto, a plea for another Bobby Kennedy (the author definitely sees parallels with the 1968 and the 2008 election . . . perhaps seeing Obama as the heir-apparent to RFK?), then you'll enjoy it. The author makes no pretense about his admiration for RFK and his desire to see another one like him.
But it is a mistake just to write this book off as another Kennedy tribute. First of all, it is well-written and readable. The book flows very well and keeps you interested throughout. It provides a pretty detailed chronicle of the campaign and does a good job of showing the evolution of RFK and his campaign advisers over time. Secondly, this book is as much about a longing for a certain style of campaigning as it is about a person. Hence the book's subtitle--82 days that inspired America. Sadly, I think, for the author, he had to use the words "inspired" rather than "changed," because in many ways, politics has gone on its usual path (or gotten worse) despite what he views as the one modern-day example of elevated political discourse and real human concern. I personally have always been fascinated by Bobby Kennedy. I was born after he was already dead, but he interests me because he seems to be impossible to pin down ideologically. I find that it unusual (though not strange) that he is a liberal icon. I tend to be in cautious agreement with the author about Kennedy, and thought this book was well-done and worthwhile, both for those who still long for RFK and those who don't. It strikes me that all politicians would benefit from trying to understand what it was about RFK's campaign that captured the imagination of so many people. This book is a step forward in that regard. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-07-01 12:04:18 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-16-08 | 5 | 5\5 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What if Robert F. Kennedy had lived to become President of the United States? It's a question that has lingered in the minds of millions of us for forty years and Thurston Clarke's terrific new book, "The Last Campaign", ends with those thoughts. By the time the reader has reached that point, a succinct and well-paced narrative has unfolded, reminding us of a time of hope and possibility. If we still marvel at the short, one thousand days of the presidency of John F. Kennedy, the eighty-two days of Bobby Kennedy's presidential campaign seem all but suspended in time.
"The Last Campaign" follows a necessary timeline...Kennedy's entry into the race in mid-March, LBJ's withdrawal on March 31, the assassination of Martin Luther King a few days later and the intense primary season of May and early June. Clarke looks at the campaign from all angles and tells a remarkable story. Kennedy loved to be with children and Native Americans, preferred large, boisterous crowds to small ones and disliked speaking to university audiences. His ruthless reputation, earned from his days working with Joseph McCarthy and later as Attorney General, softened in the spring of 1968, as if he had finally been released to be himself. Indeed, Clarke points out that the most exhilarating times of the campaign were at the beginning and right at the end. The author is careful to include much of the relevant political scene that spring. Eugene McCarthy, who had the support of the young idealists and who was a man RFK loathed, was his chief rival, but Hubert Humphrey loomed large and had the support of the party establishment. But it was the New York senator, (with the help of the "honorary" Kennedys... those linked to RFK through marriage and politics) who put a personal stamp on the issues of the day and who had the engaging touch reflected in his primary wins in Indiana, Nebraska, South Dakota and California. It is noted in the book that many of today's campaign issues are not all that different from 1968...an unpopular war and an even more unpopular president and race relations, to name just two. Speculation will always be the order of the day when it comes to thinking about what a Robert F. Kennedy presidency might have been like, but Thurston Clarke has laid down the groundwork for what that might have been, and in doing so, has given us a lasting tribute to Robert F. Kennedy and his final political endeavor. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-23 02:15:36 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-14-08 | 5 | 0\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a great story about a remarkable time that ended too soon. I hope that our current democratic nominee can restore some of this hope.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-17 01:11:17 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-13-08 | 1 | 0\6 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A confession -- I was a supporter of RFK, although only in high school (my first presidential election, 1972). I thought he would have made a terrific president, and in retrospect, having lived through the Neanderthal Nixon, Reagan & Bush II, I feel that even more.
This book could have been so good, but it is so bad. I say that because the author obviously did a great deal of research, not just reading the newspapers of the day but interviewing perhaps 100s of people who were RFK associates or were present at many of the campaign-related incidents he relates. He had a pile of good primary source material. And it is OK that he is sympathetic with his subject. But the book is written as if an application for Bobby's sainthood. According to the author, RFK could do no wrong. Whenever he finds a blemish about Bobby -- about his personality, his campaign style, his changes of opinion, his speeches, his strategy -- there is always an excuse. It is either twisted into a positive or blamed on someone else or explained away as something totally minor in the grand scheme of things. This approach got me angrier & angrier as the book went on with no analysis (the book contains no analysis, don't expect it). I kept hoping that the sainthood application would leave off and be replaced by proper political history. And it never did. The author is also a firm subscriber to the great man of history school of writing. Trying to convince us that the whole history of the US & the world would have been fundamentally & completely different had Bobby been elected. I have no doubt that things would have been better, or somewhat better (assuming that Bobby had actually been elected ... it seems to me that there was a better than even chance that Nixon would have won in 1968 even had RFK lived, and certainly something akin to the Reagan revolution ... to which I was not a partisan ... would have occurred later). I do not recommend this book. There has to be something better on the subject. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-16 01:11:43 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-12-08 | 5 | 2\3 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When I first heard there was going to be another RFK book about his final days campaigning towards the Democratic nomination-- and as much as I am an RFK fan-- I was still rather "ho hum" about the prospects of learning anything new. Five pages into Thurston Clarkes' latest book, The Last Campaign, I was hooked, spell bounded and most of all educated like never before. Clarke paints a new portrait of RFK, one that ties the words from his speeches and uses those words to help the reader gain detailed insight into the person RFK was becoming; as a leader, as a politician, as a father and most of all as a man. The ever changing Bobby is the one of many reasons he is dearest in my heart along with his ability to always improve his knowledge, for always asking the question, "what is the right thing to do", and his ability to display and share his pain.
Clarke shows us a man raised in tremendous wealth can care about the common man, can care about the farmer, can care about the poor and impoverish, can care about our educational standards, can care about hunger in America, can care about doing what is correct AND not always what is politically correct and can care with sincere compassion and grace. RFK's legacy is left for all us to share, to embrace and keep alive. He would not want us asking the question "what would happen had he lived?" He would want us to carry the torch of his ideas, his values, his moral courage, his search for knowledge, his compassion and his grace. This book showed me that there is a piece of RFK in all of us. Clarke's book combines my two favorite passions: the very well written word and RFK. It's the best book ever of RFK. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-15 01:10:43 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-12-08 | 5 | 2\3 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What was there about this intense, brave, confused, very funny, and very tender-hearted campaign - one that lasted a mere 82 days - that haunts us more than ever after 40 years? Why is it impossible to see even a glimpse of Robert Kennedy on TV without feeling, in Norman Mailer's words: "sorrowful as rue in the throat"?
Thurston Clarke's "The Last Campaign" moves us toward that answer, in a way that is more like a piece of music than a literary creation. He makes us understand that the campaign -- the wound that will never heal - was not constructed as an ideological pursuit, and as Clarke takes us forward we understand that it doesn't seem to make much strategic sense either. Yet it is impossible to imagine a campaign that has ever embodied something as intensely specific as this one: what it means to be human. For Robert Kennedy that meant obsessive concern with all that is hurt, hungry, ignored, degraded, invisible; tenderness toward the broken; self-deprecation bordering on shame for all he was blessed with; political, moral and physical bravery that would make Hemingway flinch; self-criticism and self-learning. Robert Kennedy burned with everything that has been burned out of our land and out of our political culture. His last campaign recalls us to those moments in all our lives, so rare, that made us fully alive, better than we thought we could be, more romantic, more brave, more moral. He lived that way every day, at least toward the end. The heartbreak of the book is, or course, the knowledge we have of what followed the extinguishing of the flame. Nixon. Watergate. Carter. Reagan. Let me mention that one again: Reagan. Bush I. Clinton I. Bush II. And almost Clinton II. Which leads to our current hope. As someone who worked for the Obama campaign, this book made me quite sad. Perhaps a leader, especially in the cool ironic virtual world of our own, cannot burn by such a light. Yet the comparison goes beyond that. Compared to the RFK campaign, Obama's did not do anything to challenge the paradigm of spin, calculation, focus groups, or safety which has suffocated just about every national campaign since 1968. In the closing days of the current campaign, Obama was giving the same stump speech in South Dakota that he gave in Iowa back in January. Kennedy changed his message all day, every day! Challenging whomever he was speaking to, saying the things which would irk them the most. Whenever Obama came to a fork in the road, between going toward courage or going toward safety, he chose safety every time(denouncing his pastor, leaving his church, suddenly turning into an anti-Castro Cuban in Florida, changing his positions in several ways before AIPAC). Well, we have what we have, and we must make do. Perhaps Senator Obama is also an existential figure, with whom God is not finished. Let us hope so. Thurston Clarke's book is as passionate and human as was the campaign he's covered. And as short. One takes it slow. One does not want to come to its end. It is a major achievement. Norman Mailer, once more: "Tragedy is amputation. The nerves of one's memory run back to the limb which is no longer there." Robert F. Kennedy - R.I.P. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-15 01:10:43 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-11-08 | 4 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was eagerly anticipating getting my hands on this book from the time I heard about it, and I wasn't at all disappointed. Clarke combines research, interviews and strong writing to create this informative book that was especially interesting to read in the midst of another historic election, albeit for many different reasons.
There are many things I liked about this book. Clarke takes readers back to the period of nearly three months during which Kennedy waged his campaign. He provides the necessary background throughout the book, but he essentially, and thankfully, sticks to a chronological account. There is some analysis, but Clarke doesn't go overboard in trying to make grandiose claims, and he doesn't try to create suspense; he just lets the story speak for itself. And it's such a fascinating story. While the book is pro-Kennedy, it's not painfully so. Readers will be made to understand why Kennedy was so loved and so hated, and what really made him tick. RFK wasn't always concerned about what would make him look the best, but he was always interested in how he could help the less fortunate. The book includes many accounts of politicians, journalists and voters saying they fell in love with RFK during this campaign. I felt the same while reading the book. On the negative side, Clarke occasionally gets bogged down with some insignificant details, like the songs they would all sing on the plane and the lyrics to those songs. And I really think the epilogue needed more details about the Chicago convention and the riots that damaged the Democratic party for so long. Since those riots may not have happened if Kennedy was in the mix, it would have been a great way to emphasize the significance of the campaign and the man. I can't quite give the book 5 stars, but it's very close, and I really believe anyone, regardless of age or interest in history, would find this book fascinating. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-14 00:04:04 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-11-08 | 5 | 1\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As you read this book, you know how the story is going end, and one of the most compelling aspects of Clarke's story is the sense that many of its principals knew what was coming, too. One of the most jarring passages comes early when a group of reporters are discussing Kennedy's chances, and one remarks that he "has the stuff to go all the way," but that he won't because "someone is going to shoot him."
That line rings in your memory throughout the book, as Clarke takes the reader on Kennedy's journey through the primary states in which he competed. He met crowds both adoring and openly hostile, and one of Kennedy's great strengths was in finding ways to connect with all of the groups in some way. Clarke shows how he shaped people's thinking from his humor and his direct appeal for the accountability of all people to help those less fortunate. The book is just as effective at demonstrating that Kennedy was disliked by as many people as adored him. When he announced his candidacy, he was derided as an opportunist. His message did not play well in suburban areas as in urban or poor rural areas. And the Kennedy name had both positive and negative brand equity. Clarke cites a number of instances in which a threat was made, or a balloon inadvertently popped (sounding potentially like a gun), to show that this was a campaign that lived in continual fear, but did not let that fear stand in the way of doing what it felt was right. There's not a lot of wasted verbiage in this book. It's about 280 pages and fast-paced. Detail is used well and you feel like you're on the road with the campaign. You understand what drove RFK and his team, and you see the impact they had in the words and faces of those they encountered. A heartbreaking story but a very good read all-around. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-14 00:04:04 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-11-08 | 4 | (NA) |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thurston Clarke's chronicling of Bobby Kennedy's short lived and long remembered presidential campaign is an interesting read for those fascinated by the Kennedy mystique and interested in political history. Occurring in just four primary states with only one real opponent, under a different presidential nominating system then exists today, the book reveals the evolution of Bobby Kennedy as a politician and the nation itself from the days of Camelot to the darker days (at least viewed from the present) of 1968. Although an interesting read, the book's major drawback is that the author views Bobby Kennedy through the same rose colored lenses as many others who look back upon the Bobby Kennedy run as a lost opportunity for America. The Bobby Kennedy of 1968 can do no wrong and has great motives. The book's bias is not partisan, it is personal. For example, when commenting on Kennedy's commendable visit to an impoverished South Dakota Indian Reservation, the author leaves the impression that Bill Clinton's efforts to improve the area as president were somehow not sufficient when compared to Kennedy's. Since Kennedy's presidency is entirely hypothetical, it is easy to imagine he would have been more successful than others, but not necessarily realistic. The book also has a strange story, quoting a photographer who goes to the Vietnam Memorial to figure out how many servicemembers were killed after January 15, 1969, the day he says Kennedy would have been inaugurated. Of course, presidents are inaugurated on the 20th of January. But beyond those nitpicks, the book is a fascinating read. In light of current events, Bobby Kennedy's primary surge through Indiana seems to have had a partial repetition in 2008. Where Kennedy won Indiana after spending a lot of time there and convincing the voters, Barack Obama came within two points of Hillary Clinton there. That was a strong showing for Obama in a state demographically aligned with Clinton's other big victories. Broad conclusions should not be drawn, but the Kennedy and Obama experiences may demonstrate Indiana's (or at least Indiana Democratic primary voters') openness to candidates and ideas. Direct parallels should not be drawn, as again the system Kennedy ran under was very different than the current practice. Worth a read, which will go by quickly, if you are interested in the Kennedys or modern American politics. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-14 00:04:04 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-09-08 | 5 | 2\3 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The book does not let the reader forget how it is going to end by opening the first chapter with the recollections of some of those on the funeral train fron New York to Washington. What is found between those images and the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel is an honest look at the promise of what might have been had RFK not been led to his rendevous with death in that hotel pantry. We are able to watch Bobby Kennedy mature from being JFK's brother to becoming a leader in his own right. America and the world lost a champion forty years ago. What a different world this might now be.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-11 01:10:24 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-08-08 | 5 | 1\2 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unscripted before it became a look that politicians tried for. Thats the feeling of RFK one gets from reading this book. It is VERY interesting to read this from today's identity politics standpoint. The author points out that RFK took some heat from middle class radicals for seeming at times to pay heed to the law and order counterforce that was sweeping the land after the violence of the 67' 68. RFK's response is quite interesting. The author quotes him to the effect of "McCarthy can be Mr. Pure, because he's never done anything for Civil Rights. I've got to show working class whites that I can be for them too" (not a direct quote)
The book is fascinating. It can be read as a spontaneous effort to keep the class cement of the the New Deal Coalition fresh, even as race and right wing demagogues and media were set to blow the house down. Yet, ironically RFK does not come accross as a preserver, but a creator. He seems spontantous, and unpredicatale the way he told audiences what they didn't want to hear but also gave a sense of what was possible if they heard it. Weirdly, they were thrown off by the RFK's honesty, because it was an honesty about inequality almost never heard from a person whose voice was allowed on national media, the real electorate. Want to know how a poltician can have the highest ever low income African American Support and also win Very White Indiana on the C-Word, Class? Read this book. Today's Corporate Democrats don't want THAT oil and water to ever mix again! Mixing that is what got him killed as the excellent new book by Shane O'Sullivan shows yet again. Be sure to also read Who Killed BobbyWho Killed Bobby?: The Unsolved Murder of Robert F. Kennedy (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-11 01:10:24 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-06-08 | 1 | 0\1 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would love to read this book - give us a version for the Kindle!!!!!
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-06 02:39:38 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-05-08 | 5 | 2\3 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lately I have been fascinated reading about the decade of the sixties, the decade before I was born. The ground work for today's events was laid during that revolutionary decade when everything changed. If I could go back in time and live through one decade it would be the 1960's. that being said I was very ignorant of Robert Kennedy. I knew he was JFK's brother, that he was Attorney General, and that he had been assassinated running for President. In this book Clark brings to life the final 82 days of Kennedy's campaign for the Presidency. Bobby raised the national conciseness on the lightening rod issues of poverty, the war in Vietnam, and race relations. He saw that the United States could do better and he gave hope that the promise could be delivered. His life was cut short by an assassin's bullet but his dream lives on. This book goes far in reminding us of Robert Kennedy's historical importance and I think everyone in my generation should read this book.
(Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-09 00:03:35 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06-03-08 | 5 | 16\17 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I worked on RFK's '68 campaign and have always been interested in accounts of it. Two journalists who covered the campaign, Jack Newfield and Jules Witcover, wrote excellent memoirs about it at the time. Forty years later, one has to ask what remains to be told.
A great deal, it turns out. Mr. Clarke's account is extraordinary in its depth and balance. For me, he has recreated the time and the man better than anyone else ever has. Reading this book, for me, was like reliving the campaign, with its exultation and ultimate desolation. An extraordinary achievement. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-08 00:06:55 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05-30-08 | 5 | 5\7 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Less than a month into Bobby Kennedy's campaign for the 1968 Democratic presidential nomination, Martin Luther King, Jr. was gunned down. Bobby was in Indianapolis at the time, and said a few words. He didn't make a political speech. He didn't read from a script. He just said a few heartfelt words that expressed his horror at the assassination and his vision for a better nation, a nation dedicated to taming the savageness of man and making gentle the life of the world (p. 96).
In this moving, eloquently written, and well researched narrative of the 82 days of Bobby Kennedy's last campaign, Thurston Clarke provides a much-needed reminder of what presidential politics could look like but hasn't for four decades. Kennedy was a genuine progressive, a man who intensely believed that the purpose of government was to protect the least advantaged in society, to set a high moral standard, and to speak the truth courageously. As Barack Obama is quoted near the book's end, it's hard to place Kennedy in the categories that "constrain [today's presidential candidates] politically...[he wasn't] a centrist in the sense of finding a middle road" (p. 279). Kennedy ran for president saying that he wanted to end the Vietnam war and poverty. In the process, he dared to speak unpleasant truths to the American people, something rarely done by political candidates. Kennedy's famous speech at Creighton University, in which he challenged the all-white student body about their indifference to the Vietnam war, is a typical example. "Look around you," he said. "How many black faces do you see here? How many American Indians? The fact is, if you look at any regiment or division of paratroopers in Vietnam, 45% of them are black. How can you accept this!?" (p. 190). Kennedy insisted that the populace which elects a president who pushes through irresponsible public and foreign policy must share moral responsibility for that policy's consequences. He recognized that unwise laws and social policies can institutionalize and legitimize violence, and called for sweeping reform (p. 108). But he also offered hope, assuring voters that they and the country had an opportunity to heal. He himself forthrightly admitted to past complicity in mistaken and even immoral, such as his early support for the Vietnam war, and humbly expressed regret (p. 45). And he assured the electorate that both they and the country could seize the moral high ground and change (p. 12). He told the country that the existence of poverty among blacks, Chicanos, southern whites, and Native Americans was a blight, and that in allowing it to endure we mocked Thomas Jefferson's claim that the U.S. was the last, best hope. Bobby's 1967 trip to Cleveland, Mississippi, where he saw some of the country's worst poverty, shook him as nothing had since his brother's assassination, and he vowed to dedicate himself to ending it. As Cesar Chavez said, Bobby Kennedy "could see things through the eyes of the poor" (p. 79). No other presidential candidate except John Edwards has so emphasized poverty in his or her campaign. Clarke's account of Bobby Kennedy's presidential campaign leaves the reader with mixed emotions. On the one hand, Clarke points out that a presidential candidate today could run on nearly all the issues that Bobby did because "little has been done to address them" in the 40 years since his murder (p. 280). Clarke also invites the reader to think about how different the nation would be today if Kennedy had lived and become president: the Vietnam war would've ended 6 years earlier with 20,000 fewer American casualties, for example, and Watergate wouldn't have eroded trust in government. That's the bad news. But on the other hand, Clarke reminds us, Kennedy showed that an idealist who courageously spoke truth to power could appeal to the American people--Kennedy's supporters came from all constituencies--and that Jefferson's high estimation of the country's promise needn't be empty rhetoric. That's the good news, the hopeful news. Highly recommended. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-06-03 00:12:20 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05-28-08 | 5 | 5\6 |
| Reviewer | Permalink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
With so many RFK books already out there, I was hoping that this one would be worth the wait....and it was. In great detail, we are taken back in time to a two and a half month period of 1968 that was full of incredible drama and intensity.
The chapter covering the Indianapolis speech was especially moving. I think anyone reading it would just get goose-bumps as it goes into more backround detail than was previously told. My God....that speech actually changed history in that city. That story....and the whole book tries to tell us what IT was that Robert Kennedy had or did that made over 2 MILLION people cry or stand at attention or just look shattered as his funeral train traveled from New York to Washington. Heart-wrenching and at the same time so uplifting....that there was once a real politician who was a human being who grew and changed and could set this kind of example for the country. Highly recommended for anyone who loves history and / or incredible life-changers. (Review Data Last Updated: 2008-05-31 00:11:53 EST)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reader Reviews 1 - 26 of 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||